Tania Nyman

Tania Nyman, mc12, 2020

Tania Nyman

Political Party Democrat
Campaign Website: https://www.tanianyman.com/
4669 Bennett Dr. Baton Rouge 70808


Ranked Statements

1. The East Baton Rouge mask mandate is lawful and should remain in place as long as necessary.
2. East Baton Rouge Parish should continue disputing the incorporation of St. George.
Strongly Agree
3. LGBTQ individuals and families should be protected locally from discrimination in the workplace, housing, and public accommodations.
4. When presented with an ITEP request, the guidelines adopted by the council should be strictly adhered to in making their determination.
5. Baton Rouge and other municipalities should have legal control over their area’s minimum wage.
6. The Metro Council should increase transparency by requiring data collection and regular reporting by contractors and the sheriff’s office on the operations, conditions, and use of funds for the parish prison.
7. The Metro Council does a satisfactory job of awarding government contracts to ensure that all businesses are given a fair chance - including Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE).


Short-answer Questions

1. Why are you running for Metro Council and how have your experiences prepared you for the responsibilities of this office?

Before I explain why I am running for the District 12 Metro Council seat, I need to state that many of my answers to the ranked statements do not clearly reflect my position on the issues. To clarify my position, I will post short statements on my website regarding question numbers 3, 4, 5 & 7. Please follow this link to read those statements: https://www.tanianyman.com/news

Regarding why I’m running for Metro Council, for the past eight years, I have been involved in community advocacy in East Baton Rouge Parish, and I believe the knowledge I have gained from that work would be an asset to the people of District 12 and East Baton Rouge Parish as a whole. My advocacy work has been focused primarily on public education, but I also have worked with a variety of organizations that provided me with a greater understanding of issues that regularly go before the Metro Council.

To read more about my qualifications and why I’m running, follow the link to my webpage: https://www.tanianyman.com/why-i-m-running

2. How will you ensure the Metro Council vets dedicated tax proposals and provides information to the public prior to bringing them to a vote?

As a Metro Council member, I will evaluate tax proposals by considering the following:

a) The nature of the tax. Is it shared equitably as opposed to equally by residents? I will likely oppose regressive sales taxes which fall disproportionately on the poor and working class and whose volatility create an unstable source of funding and reduce bond ratings.

b) The merits of the project or objective. Is the proposal in the best interest of the community and is it sufficiently detailed to ensure the approval of the tax will provide the service promised?

c) The duration of the tax. Most dedicated taxes should be returned to the ballot at regular intervals in order to allow voters the opportunity to accept or reject the millage. There should be a compelling reason to extend the term for renewal beyond 10 years.

I’m not certain what services would be at my disposal as a Metro Council person to inform constituents about such matters, but I will certainly reach out to neighborhood associations and other community leaders. It should also be easy enough to post a press release to the website and host town halls to discuss.

3. The Metro Council appoints members to several local boards and commissions. What should be taken into consideration when making these appointments? When should an appointee accused of misconduct be removed?

What should be taken into consideration when making appointments to boards and commissions is the needs of the particular board or commission. Such bodies benefit when their members have a shared purpose—to ensure the department or organization fulfills its mission—and can provide a variety of skills and viewpoints. To ensure such diversity I would consider the skills and viewpoints of the existing members to determine which candidate offers the skills or views currently lacking or most in need on the board or commission. Please know that I am not speaking solely about racial or gender diversity. That is important, but so is a diversity of perspective. If, for example, the board members are racially diverse but are all beholden to, say, a particular business agenda, then the lack of diversity in perspective will inhibit the board’s ability to make the best decision for the community as a whole. I don’t imagine balancing such considerations is easy.

In regard to removing an appointee accused of misconduct, I believe an appointee should be granted the same right to due process as any citizen accused of misconduct or a crime. They should not be removed when merely accused. They should be removed only if it is determined they are guilty of misconduct and the misconduct is egregious enough to warrant their removal.

4. How would you balance what you feel is best for your district versus what may be best for the parish as a whole?

I don’t believe it is possible to do what is best for one’s district without considering what is also best for the parish as a whole. Our well-being is intertwined. The challenge is to raise awareness about this interconnectedness and articulate a vision for a better quality of life for all that can inspire unity rather than division.

BR Votes is a project of Progressive Social Network, a non-partisan 501(c)3 non-profit organization